Government and its agents (police and district attorneys) have no legal duty to protect; they cannot be held liable for failing to protect. The Problem? They have no legal duty to disclose this. Even worse, there is no evidence that the general population knows of it. See Warren vs. District of Columbia; DeShaney vs. Winnebago County Department of Social Services; Stone vs. N.C. Department of Labor; Castle Rock vs. Gonzales, just to name a few.
Friday, August 27, 2010
PDD.143: Half-truths are still half-truths
Consider these news articles in which the Public Duty Doctrine is not disclosed to the public: http://wbztv.com/local/norton.police.response.2.1793057.html and http://www.truth-out.org/connie-schultz-cut-budget-then-arm-citizens-judge-says58773
Thursday, August 26, 2010
PDD.142: Restraining Orders
Yesterday, 8-25-2010, in the Asheville Citizens-Times newspaper (print), page A2, under the title of "Police response cut with budgets: Areas place focus on violent crimes," by Kevin Johnson of USA TODAY, a remarkable thing happened.
First, read the on-line version. http://www.usatoday.com/news/nation/2010-08-25-1Anresponsecops25_ST_N.htm
So, I first read the actual print paper. And then I compared it with the on-line USA TODAY version, and, lo and behold, there was a paragraph missing. And then I checked the Asheville Citizen-Times on-line version, which is a link back to USA TODAY, and, again, the paragraph was missing from it too!!! With no reference to the article being edited. In other words, the on-line version from both news medias are being represented as being the original, with no edits.
Now, here is the missing paragraph (It goes between "The chiefs are putting the best face ....." and "In Tulsa, which lost 110 officers to layoffs..."): "Oakland police say they don't have enough resources to dispatch officers to theft, vandalism and car burglaries. Residents instead are being asked to report the incidents via computer. Violations of restraining orders are among the offenses on the no-dispatch list."
Focus on the last sentence: "Violations of restraining orders are among the offenses on the no-dispatch list."
No. 1: Of course, there was no mention made of The Public Duty Doctrine. No. 2: This is a classic example of American journalism as being suspect, and the reason for the need of blogs to get the truth out.
First, read the on-line version. http://www.usatoday.com/news/nation/2010-08-25-1Anresponsecops25_ST_N.htm
So, I first read the actual print paper. And then I compared it with the on-line USA TODAY version, and, lo and behold, there was a paragraph missing. And then I checked the Asheville Citizen-Times on-line version, which is a link back to USA TODAY, and, again, the paragraph was missing from it too!!! With no reference to the article being edited. In other words, the on-line version from both news medias are being represented as being the original, with no edits.
Now, here is the missing paragraph (It goes between "The chiefs are putting the best face ....." and "In Tulsa, which lost 110 officers to layoffs..."): "Oakland police say they don't have enough resources to dispatch officers to theft, vandalism and car burglaries. Residents instead are being asked to report the incidents via computer. Violations of restraining orders are among the offenses on the no-dispatch list."
Focus on the last sentence: "Violations of restraining orders are among the offenses on the no-dispatch list."
No. 1: Of course, there was no mention made of The Public Duty Doctrine. No. 2: This is a classic example of American journalism as being suspect, and the reason for the need of blogs to get the truth out.
Thursday, August 12, 2010
PDD.141: What a "Justice Index" Must Include
Such an index must include whether or not the general public knows of the Public Duty Doctrine http://www.nytimes.com/2010/08/11/opinion/11bach.html
PDD.140: "Tribal Law and Order"
New York Times, August 2, 2010, opinion section: http://www.nytimes.com/2010/08/02/opinion/02mon3.html
Tuesday, August 10, 2010
PDD.139: OSHA too little, too late, as usual
Key words: "...371 violations, including 225 considered 'willful,' found after the Feb. 7 blast..."
Consider this Connecticut case: http://www.nytimes.com/2010/08/06/nyregion/06middletown.html
Consider this Connecticut case: http://www.nytimes.com/2010/08/06/nyregion/06middletown.html
PDD.138: Eating Gulf Coast Fish
Before you eat any fish from the Gulf Coast, you might want to look at my blog posting .102, which specifically draws your attention to paragraph [75] of the following article http://biotech.law.lsu.edu/cases/food/winstead.htm
Friday, August 6, 2010
PDD.137: State of Am. Legal Profession
If the police and district attorneys have no legal duty to protect, and they cannot be held liable for failing to protect, individual Americans have had to turn to lawyers to seek justice. American lawyers over the past 50 years have done a lot of good and a lot of harm. But, now, the average American may not have a choice if the following trend continues. Consider this: http://classic.cnbc.com/id/38572210
Thursday, August 5, 2010
PDD.136: A Scientific Poll (Survey)
What needs to be done, before any legal action, is a scientific poll. A representative sampling of the U.S. population needs to be asked the question: Have you ever heard of the Public Duty Doctrine, either specifically or generally?
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)