Friday, November 20, 2009

The Public Duty Doctrine.31: Cattle?

If we accept the Evolutionary notion that we're animals, what difference is there between humans and cattle?

I thought about this while standing on my porch this chilly morning, watching the cows graze across the way, penned into their little section of pasture. They are cordoned by barbwire into one section, and then rotated into another, and then another, so they don't over-graze any one section.

It's kind of like when countries created borders, then passports, then immigration policies and quotas. There was apparently a need to restrict mass population movements, restricting the nomadic lifestyle. Probably for personal income tax purposes. I think most illegal immigrants in this country never got the memo. Maybe they're resorting to the old nomadic ways and the hell with local laws.

I digressed here. Sorry about that.

What is the relationship between civilized humans and domesticated cattle, especially having to do with the Public Duty Doctrine? Government and its agents fail to disclose they have no legal duty to protect individual humans (although they have every right to control same), just as cattle (a commodity) are unaware they're going to be slaughtered. "Keep eating! Keep buying!"
Our economy rewards passive-submissive behavior.

As I've said before, the history of mankind is all about slavery and/or cheap labor. Cows labor by grazing. Humans labor by buying stuff.

Humans and cattle are fenced in, movements are restricted. If either breaks out, they are apprehended and incarcerated. They're considered socially adjusted as long as they keep grazing and don't make waves. Government and its agents, and ranchers, fear civil unrest/stampedes; humans and cattle should never be spooked. American citizens (cheap labor) and cattle (cheap food) should be kept in the dark, on a need to know basis, regarding the role they play in our? system.

Maybe that's why The Public Duty Doctrine is not disclosed in schools, by the police or district attorneys, corporate media, social workers, politicians -- because they're afraid of a stampede.
Tea Parties anyone?

I have no doubt that managers/experts world-wide, on the whole, view their subordinates as cattle, unruly, unpredictable, prone to being spooked ("Refrain from gossip on the shop floor!), easily motivated by monetary-carrot rewards.

You're either the managed or the manager.

Lately, managers have been getting away with murder. Remember Wall Street and the looting of our treasury? They operate under a different system from the managed. They have no fences, no moral foundation, except "Do whatever it takes, but don't get caught," no flag they pledge their allegiance to, no home, except a Swiss bank account.

So, what is the difference between humans and cattle in a "managed economy"? Nothing.

Welcome to Wanesville, home of the grazed and slaughtered.

No comments:

Post a Comment